<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Individuals Have Brains, Groups Do Not</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thebinarycircumstance.com/2006/09/10/2395/individuals-have-brains-groups-do-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thebinarycircumstance.com/2006/09/10/2395/individuals-have-brains-groups-do-not/</link>
	<description>Things either exist or they don't</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: What causes rants against teamwork and collaboration? &#171; Stronger Teams Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.thebinarycircumstance.com/2006/09/10/2395/individuals-have-brains-groups-do-not/comment-page-1/#comment-16312</link>
		<dc:creator>What causes rants against teamwork and collaboration? &#171; Stronger Teams Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebinarycircumstance.com/2006/09/10/2395/individuals-have-brains-groups-do-not/#comment-16312</guid>
		<description>[...] The words It was when I started cataloging the content of the posts about Freedman&#8217;s article that a pattern emerged. The pattern? In a word: Rants. Freedman&#8217;s article seems to have unleashed passions, resulting in several rant-like posts against teamwork and collaboration. Here is a sampling of the posts I categorized as agreeing with Freedman&#8217;s views. A myth that needs to be flushed down. A brick or a concrete block can&#8217;t think because it doesn&#8217;t have a brain. A group doesn&#8217;t have a brain. You wouldn&#8217;t want a brick to think for you because it can&#8217;t. Why would you want a group to think for you? Does it make sense to base an entire political and social system like democracy on such a fallacy? Of course not. Yet every election day, we allow a group to make our decisions for us. Meetings populated by yes-men and time-wasting boardroom jockeys. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The words It was when I started cataloging the content of the posts about Freedman&#8217;s article that a pattern emerged. The pattern? In a word: Rants. Freedman&#8217;s article seems to have unleashed passions, resulting in several rant-like posts against teamwork and collaboration. Here is a sampling of the posts I categorized as agreeing with Freedman&#8217;s views. A myth that needs to be flushed down. A brick or a concrete block can&#8217;t think because it doesn&#8217;t have a brain. A group doesn&#8217;t have a brain. You wouldn&#8217;t want a brick to think for you because it can&#8217;t. Why would you want a group to think for you? Does it make sense to base an entire political and social system like democracy on such a fallacy? Of course not. Yet every election day, we allow a group to make our decisions for us. Meetings populated by yes-men and time-wasting boardroom jockeys. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
