Comments on: Runaway Bride Enjoys Legal Honeymoon http://www.thebinarycircumstance.com/2005/04/30/1316/runaway-bride-enjoys-legal-honeymoon/ Things either exist or they don't Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:38:58 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Trey Givens http://www.thebinarycircumstance.com/2005/04/30/1316/runaway-bride-enjoys-legal-honeymoon/#comment-846 Trey Givens Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.thebinarycircumstance.com/?p=1316#comment-846 "Stewart's action of selling some stock before some bad news became public" The argument might be made that Stewart's action, the one for which she was convicted -- "for lying to legal authorities" -- did cost the tax payers money because investigators could not as easily prove their case against her. “Stewart’s action of selling some stock before some bad news became public”

The argument might be made that Stewart’s action, the one for which she was convicted — “for lying to legal authorities” — did cost the tax payers money because investigators could not as easily prove their case against her.

]]> By: mfblogger http://www.thebinarycircumstance.com/2005/04/30/1316/runaway-bride-enjoys-legal-honeymoon/#comment-847 mfblogger Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.thebinarycircumstance.com/?p=1316#comment-847 The problem with insider trading is it drags the value of the market down. Why would I invest in the market when I know it's fixed? I'm not going to receive information from Sam regarding his company's failure to receive FDA approval; however, Martha does. Who is in the better position to absorb a $40,000 loss? Martha or a investor whose entire portfolio may be worth $60,000? To say Martha Stewart's actions had no effect on taxpayers is to be disingenuous at best and ignorant or dishonest at worst. And Danny Porter is a sorry excuse for a law enforcement official. Ask Tammy Gilbert. Oh, you can't because she's dead, killed by a criminal whose bond Porter reduced. The problem with insider trading is it drags the value of the market down. Why would I invest in the market when I know it’s fixed? I’m not going to receive information from Sam regarding his company’s failure to receive FDA approval; however, Martha does. Who is in the better position to absorb a $40,000 loss? Martha or a investor whose entire portfolio may be worth $60,000? To say Martha Stewart’s actions had no effect on taxpayers is to be disingenuous at best and ignorant or dishonest at worst. And Danny Porter is a sorry excuse for a law enforcement official. Ask Tammy Gilbert. Oh, you can’t because she’s dead, killed by a criminal whose bond Porter reduced.

]]> By: L K Tucker http://www.thebinarycircumstance.com/2005/04/30/1316/runaway-bride-enjoys-legal-honeymoon/#comment-848 L K Tucker Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.thebinarycircumstance.com/?p=1316#comment-848 In all the psycho-babble there has been no mention of the psychiatric diagnosis that describes what happened, Dissociative Fugue. Wilbanks may not know what happened to her. Note that no one has stepped forward to say they were the couple on the bus. Everything Wilbanks said may have been confabulation. That is common in cases of dissociative mental breaks. http://visionandpsychosis.net/Jennifer_Wilbanks_Disappearance.htm In all the psycho-babble there has been no mention of the psychiatric diagnosis that describes what happened, Dissociative Fugue.

Wilbanks may not know what happened to her.

Note that no one has stepped forward to say they were the couple on the bus. Everything Wilbanks said may have been confabulation. That is common in cases of dissociative mental breaks.

http://visionandpsychosis.net/Jennifer_Wilbanks_Disappearance.htm

]]>