Obstruction of Justice
Posted in Courts and Law, Government/Politics on September 30th, 2004 by Chip GibbonsIt is ironic that on the day that Martha Stewart said she’s going to serve her time in a federal prison in West Virginia, Trey Givens quotes Skip Oliva on the subject of obstruction of justice. All the “crimes” that Stewart was convicted of basically boiled down to obstruction of justice by lying.
There is, however, a great degree of subjectivism in the existing legal system. Most “crimes”-especially at the federal level-are subjective crimes of “art??? rather than violations of individual rights. The most common subjective crime is “obstruction of justice,??? which basically encompasses any act that displeases a prosecutor in the course of an investigation. Unlike perjury, which has an objective definition (lying under oath), obstruction charges are inherently subjective, and thus common tools of prosecutorial abuse.
I have written several articles about Martha Stewart’s conviction. She was basically convicted for being disobedient, something that cannot be a crime, in and of itself, in a free society.
I would argue that it was the government that engaged in obstruction of justice, but nobody will be sending them to jail any time soon. They have the guns.