<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Martha Stewart&#8217;s Tainted Jury</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thebinarycircumstance.com/2004/03/31/550/martha-stewarts-tainted-jury/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thebinarycircumstance.com/2004/03/31/550/martha-stewarts-tainted-jury/</link>
	<description>Things either exist or they don't</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: What I Learned Today</title>
		<link>http://www.thebinarycircumstance.com/2004/03/31/550/martha-stewarts-tainted-jury/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>What I Learned Today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebinarycircumstance.com/?p=550#comment-302</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Martha Stewart Redux&lt;/strong&gt;

Remember Chappell Hartridge, the juror who said that Martha Stewart's conviction was a "victory for the little guy" back in March? Remember how Martha's lawyers planned to appeal her conviction by focusing on the judge's restrictions of her defense opt...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Martha Stewart Redux</strong></p>
<p>Remember Chappell Hartridge, the juror who said that Martha Stewart&#8217;s conviction was a &#8220;victory for the little guy&#8221; back in March? Remember how Martha&#8217;s lawyers planned to appeal her conviction by focusing on the judge&#8217;s restrictions of her defense opt&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
